Re: Confirmation on package rename

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 August 2013 17:47, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What has happened to

  guacamole-common-javadoc.noarch
  guacamole-ext-javadoc.noarch

? Those are not built anymore, but nothing obsoletes them.

Taken care during guacamole-client review [1].

> Should I run "fedpkg retire <explanation>" in each branch that is going to
> be obsolete by the new packages AFTER the new packages [2] hit stable,
> right?

Before or after, doesn't matter. Most important is that the new packages
have been reviewed and approved. Remember, the old packages have been
published already and are still available in the repositories. Activities
in package git, pkgdb and koji don't affect the repository users. (And I
assume you've published the new builds for Rawhide already, too, so the koji
blocking request will only result in removing packages that have been
obsoleted by the newer builds anyway.)

I will obsolete them now, in case of trouble new updates could be pushed to Bodhi and there's no need to revert back to the old split packages.

Many thanks!

Regards,
---Simone

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985814



You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux