Le 02/08/2013 09:32, Lukas Zapletal a écrit : > Hello, > The only issue is we need to keep our SCL macros (maily scl_prefix and > few others) in our packages, because as you can see [1] it is pretty > inconvenient to maintain those as a separate branches or patch sets (the > scl_prefix is spread all over the SPEC file causing lots of conflicts). Explained here : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Software_Collection_Macros So this is acceptable. I also have some of my spec adapted for SCL in rawhide, because the changes are quite minor. Mostly because I don't want to loose my work. I hope we'll be able in the (near) future to build packages in EPEL for/using RHSCL. In this case, the SCL will be in a specific branch (and the fedora spec will be clean for more legibility). Remember, there is no rule to use the same spec in all branches ;) Remi. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
