Re: some packaging issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: some packaging issues
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:25:05 +0800
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALsL9AsgKE=-cxSfiNfpDkdect5nKfy-6ix2Lh6yTYTmmoF0iA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALsL9AsgKE=-cxSfiNfpDkdect5nKfy-6ix2Lh6yTYTmmoF0iA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I hope V=1 could be a MUST in the feature, I may create a ticket at FPC.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: some packaging issues
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

References:
- some packaging issues
  - From: Parag N(पराग़)

Prev by Date: Re: [virt-tools-list] AppIndicator3 not appindicator
Next by Date: Re: some packaging issues
Previous by thread: some packaging issues
Next by thread: Re: some packaging issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux