Re: Web Assets/JavaScript guideline drafts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 11/07/2013 12:32, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :

>> Could web server configuration be included in web-assets package ?
> 
> Perhaps, if that's what the httpd maintainers would prefer.  I really
> don't want JS library packages to drag in httpd though, since they can
> be used by Ruby and Node.js too, so this would have to be done
> carefully.

Yes, carefully, I agree it will be awful to pull httpd in the
dependencies. Despite, I think this is a better solution, as this could
also be used in EPEL (while having httpd changed in RHEL will be a long
road...).

A web-assets-httpd subpackage, seems a trivial solution.

> 
>> Have you a proposal for the change required in the web server package ?
> 
> Just something like:
> Alias /assets /usr/share/assets
> 
> And maybe "Options -Indexes" for this directory if that's desirable
> for security?

Also missing the "Require all granted" to allow access.


Remi.

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux