On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 22:30:25 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Yeah I know.
> >
> > But when sometimes a staff from Red Hat Perl SIG asked me to do
> > that, what could I say?
>
> Tell them they should add it to %{perl_default_filter} then instead of
> making packagers hack around it in 2,000+ packages?
>
> That being said, the fix for this is just:
> %global __provides_exclude ^perl(strict)$
>
> It's not really worth making a fuss over.
Christopher has not posted a bug reference so we can't be sure but I
think he's being asked to add a BuildRequires: perl(strict), not a
provides/requires filter.
Paul.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
