-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2013 01:15 PM, James Antill wrote: > * Policy around packagers not getting an exception for a library > or refusing to comply with an unbundling ruling - > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/301 (spot, 16:41:10) * ACTION: > policy draft approved (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 16:43:46) > According to the proposal, the way to deal with a maintainer not dealing with a bundling problem is to kick it to FESCo. What do you see as FESCo's responsibility here? I see the following possibilities: 1) FESCo orders the package blocked from the distro (may be hard to enforce for packages with many children. 2) FESCo takes away package-ownership and finds a new caretaker for it (Hard to accomplish since FESCo has no resources to direct) 3) FESCo sends a sternly-worded email to the maintainer 4) ??? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHDRP8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NqOwCfWkJC/Cs6EWeVuMI7nbkRMafP akgAn0VsAYWciLdzrATm5Na05AwndwGj =Dldt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
