tor 2013-06-13 klockan 17:34 +0200 skrev Simone Caronni: > > Exactly, here an example of a Koji build done with _isa'ed > BuildRequires (taken from the link I've posted before): > > $ rpm -qpR libguac-client-vnc-0.6.0-4.fc17.src.rpm > cairo-devel(x86-64) > gnutls-devel(x86-64) > libguac-devel(x86-64) = 0.6.0 > libvncserver-devel(x86-64) > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > This means I can't rebuild the src.rpm on an i686. This is wrong. If what you say above was true it would be a problem. But it doesn't work like that. $ uname -p x86_64 $ rpm -q --requires -p globus-common-14.9-3.fc18.src.rpm | grep x86 globus-core(x86-32) >= 8 libtool-ltdl-devel(x86-32) $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'globus-core(x86-32)' 'libtool-ltdl-devel(x86-32)' inget paket tillhandahåller globus-core(x86-32) inget paket tillhandahåller libtool-ltdl-devel(x86-32) $ rpmbuild --rebuild globus-common-14.9-3.fc18.src.rpm ... build succeeds ... because the BRs needed on the build system's architecture are there [ellert@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'globus-core(x86-64)' 'libtool-ltdl-devel(x86-64)' globus-core-8.9-6.fc18.x86_64 libtool-ltdl-devel-2.4.2-7.fc18.x86_64 The bogus requires in the created source rpm is no reason to write a broken spec file. Mattias
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
