Re: RFE: Documentation packages - no base packagedependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:40:56 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:

> > Proposed addition to the guidelines:
> > 
> >     Independent documentation -doc packages typically don't require the
> >     base package. It should be possible to install documentation without
> >     having to install a program and all its dependencies.

> Perhaps meaning of "Independent" (documentation) is ambiguous.

"Separate documentation -doc packages ..."?

The word should refer to documentation that has been split off into a 
separate -doc package (because it's not required at run-time and
not at install-time either).

> I think it is better to write explicitly that duplicating directory
> ownership is allowed (if your new proposition is accepted).

That's covered by this already:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function

-- 
mschwendt
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.4-301.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.01 0.04 0.07
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux