Re: nodejs-ronn and rubygem-ronn conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, den 05.06.2013, 00:13 -0700 schrieb T.C. Hollingsworth:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:40 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > rubygem-ronn should probably ship /usr/bin/ronn as it is the original
> > implementation.  I'll fix nodejs-ronn to use /usr/bin/nodejs-ronn
> > tomorrow if there are no objections.
> 
> This is now done in all branches:
> Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=424666
> F19: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-2.fc19
> F18: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-2.fc18
> EL6: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ronn-0.4.0-2.el6

Thanks a lot for the quick fix!

> Sorry for the trouble.  Thanks to Björn for reporting and Tom for
> tracking down how this slipped past the radar.

Never mind! You're welcome!

Cheers,
  Björn

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux