Re: using the tilde in tarball versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/13 16:56, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 12:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've had a look at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734802
>>
>> and I understand that tildes are supported by new versions of RPM, but
>> not by Fedora infrastructure
>>
>> I'm currently trying to prepare an upstream project to build tarballs
>> and I would like to use tildes in the version number of the test
>> tarballs and distribute them through the upstream web site.
> Can you explain why do want to do so?
>
> To me personally, there is not any single reason for using ~ in
> version numbers, except of lack of experience of upstreams, who do not
> understand that ~ and other special characters ($€?!) cause a lot of
> confusion.
>
There are various factors in this particular project that will lead to
confusion, the existence of 3 forks each releasing with the same name
probably makes the question of tildes look rather tame

For my purposes, these are not official releases and will not be tagged
in the upstream repository, so they can't have names like
project-3.3.0.tar.gz

The goal is to release project-3.3.0.tar.gz in a few weeks.

I am working on trunk which has 3.3 in AC_INIT.  There is a 3.2 branch
and that is unrelated to this work.

Therefore, using names like project-3.3.0~test1.tar.gz makes it clear that:

project-3.2*.tar.gz  < project-3.3.0~test1.tar.gz < project-3.3.0.tar.gz

Using a name like project-3.2.999.nextrelease.1.tar.gz would also ensure
proper sequencing but I feel that is more confusing.

Regards,

Daniel
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux