On 04/09/2013 02:10 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 04/09/2013 09:39 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 04/08/2013 02:28 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Do we really use -core as name of it?
We have to have some name for the original web application without any
webserver dependency. Ideally, we would just use the package name
(like "mailman") and "mailman-httpd" for httpd related config files,
but this can't be done, because we should keep backward compatibility.
However, it could be preferred way for newly added packages.
Or skip that backwards compatibility and just have a flag release with
all those changes.
How would upgrade work then? If I understand it well, RPM would update
just "mailman" package, so the httpd config files would be removed
(since they would be in "mailman-httpd" and this won't be "mailman"'s
dependency). User would have to install -httpd subpakage manually. I
think this is not OK, but maybe it's not problem to do it like that and
it is me who is wrong :).
JBG
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Jan Kaluza
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
