Re: Web server conf selection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Web server conf selection
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:06:34 +0800
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAOCN9ryBt9GstH06Q5tSw4HR7uJ58eXHyD72eV=fnOnZyTAuOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHcXnBG2gLaLscvTP558CcOep44-d5LwRuMZeQB-Ft4YX3J3EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOCN9ryBt9GstH06Q5tSw4HR7uJ58eXHyD72eV=fnOnZyTAuOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry, yes for what?

Sent from Subor Gameplayer

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

References:
- Web server conf selection
  - From: Christopher Meng
- Re: Web server conf selection
  - From: Nico Kadel-Garcia

Prev by Date: Re: Web server conf selection
Next by Date: JFYI: snappy conflicts
Previous by thread: Re: Web server conf selection
Next by thread: Re: Web server conf selection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux