----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamie Nguyen" <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Truong Anh. Tuan" <tuanta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 1:31:44 PM > Subject: Re: python3-pyside package issue > > On 30/03/13 06:15, Truong Anh. Tuan wrote: > > I got a problem when packaging a new package, ibus-bogo [1]. > > Upstream developers use Python 3 bindings for Qt4 while I just found > > python-pyside (for Python 2) in Fedora package database [2]. > > > > Seems I need to work on another new package python3-pyside too, right? > > Any ideas and suggestions? > > It looks like pyside is a good candidate for a python3 subpackage: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Subpackages > > You can open a bugzilla against python-pyside and request that the > maintainers also build pyside for python3 (which at first glance looks > like it would be a trivial task). If you are familiar with python > packaging then you can speed things along by posting a patch for the > spec yourself that adds python3 support. I've done this a couple of times: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909831 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911933 Thanks for your suggestions. I see it's best to try to package missing packages. Kind regards, Tuan -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
