Re: Filtering Provides for Node.js Binary Extension Modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mar 26, 2013 8:01 AM, "Marcela Mašláňová" <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03/13/2013 10:47 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>>
>> Like the equivalent many other languages, Node.js C++ extension
>> modules result in unwanted provides that by policy need to be
>> filtered,  We definitely want to provide a %nodejs_default_filter
>> similar to Perl's %perl_default_filter to make this easy for
>> packagers.
>>
>> However, I understand the old guidelines are outdated, and Perl's
>> macro already uses the new version [1].  Should we go ahead and use
>> the new version too when implementing %nodejs_default_filter or wait
>> for the draft to be approved?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -T.C.
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFilteringDraft
>> --
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>
> I would use the new macro.

+1

As a side comment, the new guidelines were one vote shy of passing last I looked (with no negative votes).

-Toshio

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux