----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen Gallagher" <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:16:00 PM > Subject: Re: Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite) > > On Thu 22 Dec 2011 12:20:57 PM CET, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > On 12/22/2011 10:31 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > >> > >> I think Rich is talking about Etherpad-lite > >> <https://github.com/Pita/etherpad-lite> which doesn't need scala, but > >> node.js. > > > > Node.js is not shipped with Fedora due to bundled library madness ( > > which is quite unfortunate for us since it's gaining popularity > > amongst developers ) however I think T.C. Hollingsworth repository is > > the official unofficial repository for node.js for Fedora 15,16 and > > RHEL 5 & 6 hence any spec file written should require what ever is > > there I believe. > > ( feel free to correct me if i'm wrong ). > > > > Just to resurrect this discussion, we now have Node.js packaged in > Rawhide and the -testing repository of F18[1]. It's not yet being > pushed to stable because it's not guaranteed ABI-stable until 0.10.0 is > released, but it's sufficiently-packaged that you could start the > process of packaging etherpad-lite now if you want to. +1. nodejs-0.9.5-9.fc18 can be found in updates-testing repo. Also, because of not following this thread from beginning (just found this *single* email in packaging@l.f.o mailing list), I am curious if someone starts packaging etherpad-lite or not. If not, I can start doing that. Kind regards, Tuan -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
