-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/01/12 12:10, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, I just stumbled upon this: the plan is to separate the bacula-docs subpackage from bacula package and create a new package bacula-docs. (review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 ) My question is, is the split possible in existing trees, e.g in F16? This step doesn't introduce new features, so it shouldn't harm https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision There's just the situation that bacula-docs is provided from earlier bacula-package and also from bacula-docs. Would those two clash in stable branches? Thanks, - -- Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDVRJAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIW6ywH/jF+C/DLB+Q+cLQXQ87KokuU bS2SPWuO3Z2UrX7oiNQHTJ5111sHvJETKL+WmQJQiE6HJus/GEerrIzGOICUYVjZ Hzi+l4UqKlhpLTs/2tc6fJv5la+oGQgtuGaoDXnIaCz2igcuXEYMzJxNJS34sD8w ZjgWz4fRtcyVD5u/x6CCVepHvnpDOZvRHsjaEPQOExTAKvkvvho6HBZu5m9oQtJq 9HrkkbyDMx+n2C162GXdwZt7cpW0/lIElQfnKttyQ8U8SMvjdy+nmYqpq0cf6fvB U5/h7l2TV2JYsHxOYzM/uD/BXorT+C+shI7PL28vmzn8+gpopjsTPRPW2UAhakI= =SlHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
