On 01/02/2012 10:15 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > bacula-docs does not really need to be part of the main package, and > apart from good packaging, rpmlint checks and packaging guidelines what > is needed to make a spinoff of the package in Fedora? Just a review for bacula-docs as a new package. ~tom == Fedora Project -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
