On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/07/2011 04:09 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: >> Would it be ok, to use it and provide a python26-zmq or is an extra >> review request needed for that? >> Couldn't find any guideline, that forbits it, but there doesn't seem >> to be any naming guideline for el, isn't it? >> > I am not sure that I have understood your question, so take the rest of > my answer with a bit of salt > python26 is in EPEL for quite some time. I see no reason to not make use > of it in your package. Sorry, maybe I could have been more concrete too... It "looks" like a problem, when a python-foo package provides a python26-foo package (what we actually do with python3 in Fedora too). I just wasn't sure if it _is_ a problem too (but didn't think so ;)) Now that nobody sees this as a no-go, I'll go ahead and build it like proposed in other mails. For those who want to look over it, here it is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3583429 Thanks for all the feedback. Tom -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
