> I'm in the middle of reviewing > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751925 python-tables and > came Toshio's useful link > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Unbundling_Python_Modules > > The maintainer has licensed the package as multi-license BSD and AFL - > on investigating it seems to included another file from a package here > http://evan.prodromou.name/Software/Python/LRUCache, however the > python-table developers have modified it significantly for there own > use, albeit with the same file and class name. > > Does this still constitute a bundled library or is it OK to include as is? > > The file in question lrucache.py is released under the AFL license and > is attributed correctly in the python-tables source (by way of a copy > of the original lrucache license). If it's significantly modified it may qualify for a copylib exception, but you may want to file a trac for FPC for further evaluation. Are there reasons why the modifications haven't been sent upstream? -J > thanks for your help > > Brendan > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
