On 07/26/2011 09:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Ville Skyttä (ville.skytta@xxxxxx) said: >> 3) pkg(sysv) -> pkg(systemd) + pkg-sysv(sysv) upgrade >> >> Expected outcome: sysv init script and possible symlinks installed, >> bootup state saved, service loaded from systemd unit, restarted if it >> was running. > > Don't do/support this. Packagers are already doing things this way, the packaging guidelines mandate this subpackaging approach if one wants to continue shipping the sysv scripts, and "yum install pkg pkg-sysv" will result in this scenario taking place on upgrade. So in my opinion either this scenario must be supported, or the sysv subpackage approach banned. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd "If present, the SysV initscript(s) must go into an optional subpackage" >> 4) pkg(sysv) + pkg-sysv(sysv) (init script co-ownership) -> >> pkg(systemd) upgrade >> >> Expected outcome: pkg(systemd) and pkg-sysv(sysv) installed, sysv >> symlinks removed but init script in place, bootup state saved, service >> loaded from systemd unit, restarted if it was running. > > REALLY don't do/support this. I dislike it as well, but on the other hand I believe my proposed scripts will work just fine in this scenario too - I'm basically just trying to come up with cases where sysv scripts might be around and cause problems. Why I'm doing that is a result from Toshio's earlier post in this thread in which he said "we don't prevent people from packaging systemVinit scripts ...". I have no problem dropping this test case though. >> 5) pkg(systemd) -> pkg(systemd) upgrade while local non-packaged sysv >> init script installed >> >> Expected outcome: all sysv stuff intact, bootup state not saved, service >> loaded from systemd unit, restarted if it was running. > > This should behave the same, scriptwise, as option #2. Right, I listed it just for completeness (so that pkg(systemd)->pkg(systemd) upgrades don't touch possibly existing sysv stuff). No problem for me dropping this test case either. >> 7) pkg(systemd) initial install while local non-packaged sysv init >> script installed >> >> Expected outcome: all sysv stuff intact, bootup state not saved, service >> loaded from systemd unit. > > This should behave the same, scriptwise, as #6. Yep, same thing as for the #5 vs #2 thing above. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
