2011/2/21 Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:46:02 -0300 > Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> At >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process >> it states >> >> "A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec >> file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific >> situations)." >> >> But what about a subpackage "static" (library)? What if there are some >> basic documentation files common to both non-static and static >> packages? > > Packaging static libraries is a bit unusual in Fedora, since it is > better to link things dynamically; only few packages provide static > libraries. Thanks Jussi, So, definitely Can I disable the static subpackage with no feeling of remorse :) ? > > The -devel package usually only contains development headers and > the .so symlink to the dynamic library, so in 99% of the cases you just > make the -static package require the -devel package, great! That's make the "magic" thing. Even that I understand reading documentation and what you comment that it's fine disable static subpackage, isn't it? which contains all > of the necessary stuff. > -- > Jussi Lehtola > Fedora Project Contributor > jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
