Isaac Fischer
2011/2/1 Erik Blankinship <erikb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
That covers your bases, gives the user an option, and doesn't violate any standards that I can see. If a standard banning Launcher install re-emerges, you won't have to do major surgery to your spec, and it will degrade gracefully.Does that satisfy any|everyone?Isaac, thank you very much for your response!Now I can get rpmbuild to successfully use rpmbuild withÂxdg-desktop-icon in %install... and in the process puts an icon on my desktop (before even installing the rpm!) ÂI am doing something wrong. ÂAny suggestions?Here is the relevant part of my spec file:Source1: %{name}.desktopBuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)BuildRequires: Âgettext, python-devel, desktop-file-utils, xdg-utils...%installrm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOTdesktop-file-install --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications %{SOURCE1}xdg-desktop-icon install --novendor %{SOURCE1}
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging