Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> During the review [1] of the redland-bindings package , I came across >>> a situation where there are common %doc files that need to be shared >>> across different bindings. These are: >>> %doc AUTHORS COPYING COPYING.LIB ChangeLog >>> %doc LICENSE.txt NEWS README TODO >>> %doc LICENSE.html NEWS.html README.html TODO.html >>> %doc LICENSE-2.0.txt NOTICE >>> %doc RELEASE.html >>> >>> The package has perl, php, python and ruby bindings, each of which has >>> its own subpackage, i.e. >>> perl-redland >>> php-redland >>> python-redland >>> ruby-redland >>> and the above are the only common files across. The question is, where >>> do these files go? >>> >>> Shall we make a common package and make all the binding subpackages >>> depend on it? If so, what shall be the name of the common package? I >>> need to add that some of the bindings have different licenses, so some >>> of the above license files may be irrelevant for some of the bindings. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Orcan >>> >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 >>> -- >>> packaging mailing list >>> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging >>> >>> >> Put the universally common ones in a -common subpackage, and put the >> ones that only apply to some in those subpackages, I think. >> >> > > Okay, then what will be the license of the -common subpackage? > > Orcan > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > Whatever license upstream says the main code is under. If that isn't clear, ask them. J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
