>>>>> "DH" == Dan HorÃk <dan@xxxxxxxx> writes: DH> My question is whether I could do the formal review on one of the DH> modules, update the spec generator as required, refresh the spec DH> files and then somehow mass-import the rest. Well, you should of course submit one or two first and then adjust the rest based on feedback. But if you want an exemption from Fedora policy, you should talk to FESCo. Personally I'd think that every package needs a review, regardless of how trivial you believe that to be. (Witness Perl modules, which are almost all identical and mechanically generated.) But don't dump them on the review queue all at once, unless you want to annoy people and have them ignore your packages altogether. - J< -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
