On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Tom \"spot\" Callaway wrote:
On 06/14/2009 05:50 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The "couple of packages disagreeing" cases need to be looked at
case-by-case, but I think for the translations and such a clearer policy
would be good. Having the filesystem package and nothing else own most
of them seems fairly obvious but what should be done when a package
introduces a new translation that filesystem doesn't yet have? Require
filesystem to be updated every time (dunno how often this happens in
reality) or ...?
We really should fix this. It should be fairly straightforward to go
through and generate a list of these improper multiple dir ownerships
(not all multiple dir ownerships are improper) and clean them up.
1. script to dump out duplicate dirs in rawhide:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/dupedirscheck.py
It only sorts on package name so duplicate dirs owned by pkgs in
multiple arches won't show up.
2. output of the above for i686:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/duplicate_owned_dirs-i686.txt
3. output of the above for x86_64:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/duplicate_owned_dirs-x86_64.txt
-sv
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
