On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 20:22:40 +0200, steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > b. About other CC licensed content -- A lot of the available content is > licensed with the Non-Commercial restriction, which is considered as a > Bad License according to the wiki page on licensing. Why is > non-commercial only restriction considered bad ? ...and is there an > alternative to including this in the official Fedora repository -- for > instance the rpm fusion repository ? The problem is that it isn't free. The nonfree rpmfusion repo includes at least some packages with no commercial use restrictions. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
