For a similar case I made the submission as a new package and explained there it was a rename for expediting the approval. I believe this works better as there is a workflow driven by the flags. Regards, Fernando ----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Hernandez" <ultrafredde@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:20:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: Renaming of upstream project/rpm/binary >>> Obsoletes foo <= 1.8 >>> >>> Please, do not forget to use the '<= 1.8' bit. Unversioned Obsoletes are a very bad thing. THX. Regarding the technical part of the rpm. But I might need to request a new CVS repo is that orrect. Should I do this through the original bugzilla for the old package or should I submit a new bugzilla with corresponding cvs request. /Federico -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
