On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I don't agree (on the existing guideline being fine and clear enough). As I wrote down, there is confusion. Some reviewers did not accept prebuilt doc files (pdf, for instance) in some reviews. If the Proposal 2 is not accepted, I will make a further proposal that says prebuilt data files are allowed unless stated otherwise in a particular guideline (fonts etc).
Orcan
> It should be the packager's decision how much of a package needs to beSeconded. The existing guideline is fine and clear enough.
> routinely rebuilt. I concur with the existing policy regarding
> rebuilding executables, but I don't think it should be expanded to
> take away packager's discretion for other things.
I don't agree (on the existing guideline being fine and clear enough). As I wrote down, there is confusion. Some reviewers did not accept prebuilt doc files (pdf, for instance) in some reviews. If the Proposal 2 is not accepted, I will make a further proposal that says prebuilt data files are allowed unless stated otherwise in a particular guideline (fonts etc).
Orcan
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
