On 06/12/2009 09:26 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Friday 12 June 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> The new GConf Schema Guidelines ( >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GConf_Scriptlets_%28draft%29 ) have been >> approved by FPC and ratified by FESCo. > > Doesn't the GPLv2+ license of the macros mean that they can only be used by > GPLv2+ (or compatible) packages? If not, why not? If yes, why not use the > original author's LGPLv2.1+ license? > Thanks for catching that! I don't know about the legality of using the macro in compatible packages but the GPLv2+ was either a typo or a misread on my part. I've fixed the page to have LGPLv2+ as the original author did. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
