On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:16 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Alexey Torkhov wrote: > >>> Waiting for comments. > >> Since RHEL4 is based on FC3, would the dos2unix concerns be valid there > >> was well? Presumably EPEL packages are covered by the packaging > >> guidelines above... > > > > Supposedly, the bug that results in fail is > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=150277 > > > > Updated the draft with the note that should be added to EPEL-specific > > guidelines. > > This issue is fixed in EL-4 too: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174016 Ah, good, so dropping EPEL4-specific note. Alexey -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
