On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:57:35PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:34:14AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >>> We probably should make sure that everything in the release criteria is >>> covered in the Packaging Guidelines. >> >> I am not sure that it primarily belongs there. Well, broken >> dependencies could be in the guidelines, like 'all the package requires >> and buildrequires >> should be satisfied by packages in the corresponding fedora release', but >> broken EVR paths mostly make sense for updates. > Wrong - They do not make sense! They are critical bugs that need to be > fixed ASAP! Sure, but they can only be introduced during updates, not during the package review. So, there could be a guideline, but it should (also) be linked from the update policy, since it is the place where broken EVR enters. -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
