Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > It's come up in the review of a package I have submitted that there is > no guideline for /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ files. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 > > My understanding is that these are not really config files. End users > should not be editing them. Many of the packages that have files in > there do not mark them as config. Some packages do. I suppose they > could be edited by end users, but I wouldn't think it would be very > common or desired. > > Should we have a guideline for them (or add to an existing one)? > > Should the be marked config or not? > > Should they not be under /etc/ at all? > > Thoughts? > I don't know enough about them to say. At first glance, I'm not certain whether they're configuration or not. They seem to define who is allowed to issue certain requests on the bus. If these are just defaults overridable elsewhere, then they are not config. If the administrator is meant to change these files to change the system defaults then they are. Maybe mclasen or davidz can tell us? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
