Le Dim 10 mai 2009 00:41, Fernando Nasser a écrit : >> > Also, I find it a bit inconsistent that java packages don't have >> to have >> > a java- prefix as python, perl, php and so on packages have to. >> >> I do to but I think this is the standard for enough packages that we >> shouldn't look at fixing it unless it's causing breakage. > > Agreed. Most (all?) of this stuff came from JPackage and there's > little > point in breaking compatibility/naming. Also, perl and python components are released from a centralised source, while java components aren't. The perl- prefix works because it's effectively a cpan- prefix Other languages like C which do not have a centralized source also do not use a common prefix. So java is consistent -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
