>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> I'm told that in this case, the problem is getting packaging JK> people to fix up the packaging issues with the software, not the JK> reviewer side. And I suppose the problem is that they can't build the packages down in the chain because they have no private builder instance, so they need to use the actual distro buildsys with their stack already tagged into it. That seems, well, sort of an abuse of the system. I guess there's not much else to do if there's no free developer time to cobble together another solution, but can folks honestly say that this is really the way that we'd like things to work? And if not, then do we really want to go through the whole process of cooking up guidelines for it? It seems to me that ideally there'd either be some other koji instance or some way to get the main buildsys to associate a tag with an external repository so that they could build up their stack with their own packages without actually having to get those packages into the main collection. Actually, that would be really useful in general. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
