Re: New Draft Packaging Guideline - Fixing Gconf schema registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Starr wrote:
> Hello everyone, 
> 
> I have created a draft guideline using OpenSuSE's existing macros.gconf2 script for Fedora.
> 
> You can find this at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/GConf
> 
> I have done an initial test with the .spec file mentioned as an example in this draft. Seems to work fine. Since this the first iteration, I would like people to comment so we can get this finalized for Fedora 12 and rejoice in speedy installs and yum updates.
> 

I've added some more comments to the page along with a possibility for
simpler rpm macros that don't use %posttrans since that doesn't seem to
have any speed gains.  Note that I've never coded rpm macros before and
I haven't tested them (gotta sleep sometime):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/GConf#Compare_gconf_schemas

mclasen, would the new macros or something like them be acceptable to you?

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux