Mattias Ellert wrote: > Here is a description of the problem at hand: > > When upstream distributes sources in a gigantic installer containing the > sources for 300+ packages it doesn't make sense to include this full > tarfile for each SRPM, since less than 1% of it is used to compile each > package. Instead the relevant subdirectory is extracted from this beast > (properly documented in the specfile in accordance to the packaging > guidelines). > What's the bugzilla URL? I think people have answered the licence question pretty well but I'm curious to see how the split up of the 300+ packages is being accomplished. That seems like it would be a more contentious area. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
