Ian Weller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:17:59PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Ian Weller wrote: >>> During the most recent meeting it was decided that I would be contacted >>> about a few issues with the WordPress plugin packaging guidelines; >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ianweller/WordPress_plugin_packaging_guidelines_(draft) >>> >>> I wasn't contacted, but I did ask spot what the issue was, and he >>> reported that we needed to know if there would be a case where the >>> plugin may not function on either platform (mu or lack thereof). The >>> answer is a strong "yes" from upstream. >>> >> How do we tell when the plugin doesn't function? If we can write that >> down in the guidelines, it will help stop people from using the template >> to create wordpress and mu plugins when the plugin only works on one >> platform. >> > If it's not in the README for the plugin then it's not likely that you > can find one small thing to be a whistleblower. The packager would have > to test it. > > Understanding this, /most/ plugins will work on both platforms. > > This OK to make that clear? > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AIanweller%2FWordPress_plugin_packaging_guidelines_(draft)&diff=94870&oldid=91805 > If there's no one thing that makes it clear that something will work only on worpress or only on mu I guess that's the best we can do. I'm willing to +1 this. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
