On 04/02/2009 02:11 PM, Robert Scheck wrote: > As written above, it is already more or less a fork, but the guys don't see > any real need to rename or much interest to maintain API, soname etc. For > them it just works with their own more or less forking-patches currently. This is great until there is a security issue or a bug fix that doesn't make into this copy. The "toss random patches against old versions of libraries and carry them forever" is a plan for disaster. We shouldn't be encouraging it. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
