Hello, all: I am now trying to review on bug 483498, then I got a question. Currently: ----------------------------------------------------------------- # repoquery --repoid=koji-11 --whatprovides '/usr/share/gnome-background-properties/*' | sort | uniq desktop-backgrounds-basic-0:9.0.0-7.noarch desktop-backgrounds-waves-0:9.0.0-7.noarch fedorainfinity-backgrounds-0:0.0.5-2.fc11.noarch gears-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch gnome-backgrounds-0:2.24.0-4.fc11.noarch invinxble-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch neon-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch solar-backgrounds-0:0.92.0-2.fc11.noarch solar-backgrounds-extras-0:0.92.0-2.fc11.noarch themes-backgrounds-gnome-0:0.5.1-2.fc11.noarch # repoquery --repoid=koji-11 --whatprovides '/usr/share/gnome-background-properties' | sort | uniq desktop-backgrounds-basic-0:9.0.0-7.noarch fedorainfinity-backgrounds-0:0.0.5-2.fc11.noarch gears-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch gnome-backgrounds-0:2.24.0-4.fc11.noarch invinxble-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch neon-backgrounds-0:0.0.1-3.fc11.noarch solar-backgrounds-0:0.92.0-2.fc11.noarch ------------------------------------------------------------------- My question is: which package should own %_datadir/gnome-background-properties? - As the name of this directory shows something related to GNOME, maybe one component of GNOME should own this directory. However in that case forcing these packages to have "Requires" for the GNOME component due to this ownership issue seems redundant. - Or maybe filesystem (even if "gnome" appears on this directory name)? Any comments appreciated. Regards, Mamoru -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
