I've updated the Explicit Requires draft with feedback from FESCo. It makes the guideline only apply to library Requires: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires === Source URL section that deals with upstream URLs that are not parsable by rpmbuild: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Troublesome_source_URLs === Section to be added to package naming and linked to Conflicts Guidelines about when upstream has used generic names for a package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Common_package_names Patrice has linked me to a similar section in the Packaging Tricks section. if someone would like to merge the rationale from there, that would be helpful. Otherwise I'll try to get to it later this week. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
