Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Saturday 14 February 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> """ >> A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's >> %files listings. >> """ > > This would mean that tiny -common subpackages containing for example > only "%doc README COPYING" and perhaps a common base dir and/or a common > config file would have to be always created if a specfile creates two > otherwise independent binary packages. Is that really always desirable? > That's undesirable but is that what it means? I see a lot of cases where we ship with README, COPYING, etc in one of a set of package+subpackages and the other subpackages contain no documentation. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
