Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So I gather as the result of this discussion would be:
>
> ----
> %post
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
>
> %postun
> if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
> touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null
> gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
> fi
>
> %posttrans
> gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || :
> ----
>
> Initial install and upgrades are handled by %post and %posttrans, final erase
> by %postun. Anything more to tweak? If not, is this discussion (see also 1)
> in my initial mail [0]) and summary enough for the FPC so you can look into
> it in a near future meeting?
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Icon_Cache
Does that look good?
Couple questions, in the %postun, there's no || : for the touch. Is
that intentional? (If not, please change it for me :-)
If %posttrans should prove controversial (I don't see a problem but if
it is) is including the gtk-update-icon-cache call in %post in its
modified state acceptable to the proposal as a whole?
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
