Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Do we have packaging guidelines applicable for the Vala programming > language? I've reviewed a couple of packages now and they don't have > a consistent naming convention. > > eg: > I think our generic naming guidelines[1]_ would recommend: > vala - the base package > Fine. > emacs-vala - emacs mode > Fine. This is an addon to emace. > gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp (universal plug'n'play) library > vala-gupnp. These are an "addon" to vala. > vtg - "Vala Toys for gEdit" currently under review here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 > gedit-vtg. This is an addon to gedit. .. _[1]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 If you think the generic guidelines don't apply or don't suggest the correct thing, feel free to propose an addition. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
