On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 08:53 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch > > > package requirements? > > > > What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm > > package will eventually be installed. Should we assume that /usr/lib is > > always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)? > > > > ~spot > > Also, how does one get this right in the age of noarch subpackages to > arch specific packages? By properly parsing and preserving contexts in rpmbuild? Admitted, "proper", "parsing" and "contexts" don't go well along with rpm. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
