On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch > > package requirements? > > What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm > package will eventually be installed. It has. In case of noarch _lib always is the "default", which normally is lib. > Should we assume that /usr/lib is > always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)? In case of noarch, yes. Because an arch'aware (e.g. lib vs. lib64) _lib/_libdir qualifies a package as "arch'ed" Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
