Re: LGPLv2.1 vs. LGPLv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:00 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I see that the Licensing page [1] treats LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 as the 
> same, with a short name of "LGPLv2".  Also, rpmlint complains about 
> LGPLv2.1 in spec files.  Why is this?

Because v2 and v2.1 are the same thing.

~spot

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux