I see that the Licensing page [1] treats LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 as the same, with a short name of "LGPLv2". Also, rpmlint complains about LGPLv2.1 in spec files. Why is this? I'm packaging a program [2] that uses 2.1 in the README/COPYING and 2 in the source code headers. I've received clarification on the license from the author as LGPLv2.1+, but now I wonder if it makes any difference since the spec tag would be the same in either case. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
