On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: >> A related question: why emacs(bin) ? > > Most elisp packages work fine with either emacs or emacs-nox installed. > emacs(bin) is provided by both of them, and requiring it in lisp packages > where appropriate is helpful so that the full featured (and much more > dependency heavy) emacs package is not pulled in in setups that are fine > with -nox, such as headless servers etc. > Unfortunately RHEL's emacs / emacs-nox do not seem to provide emacs(bin), so in that case, since RPM does not allow for either-or dependencies, what would the best solution be? 1. Requires: emacs and disenfranchise emacs-nox users 2. Requires: /usr/bin/emacs and draw the ire of yum users having to download filelists. Thanks, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
