On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Michel Salim <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When packaging a package that contains Emacs mode files, should the > Emacs subpackage require emacs(bin) or emacs? emacs(bin) seems to be > commonly used, but this is not provided by RedHat/Fedora Emacs > packages until version 22; RHEL 5.2 is still on 21.4 and thus EPEL > packages would have to be specially handled. > A related question: why emacs(bin) ? xemacs provides xemacs(bin) too so the question applies there. We don't ever plan for the binary to be provided in a subpackage, do we? Thanks, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
