Re: The role of %{_libexecdir} for using environment-modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:15 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>>> It still feels like a bit of an abuse of libexec.
>>>> I prefer using %{_libdir}/%{name}(-%{version})/bin for this purpose.
>>> Agreed.  As had been pointed out already, libexec is for private stuff, 
>>> not exposed to the end-user.
>> Agreed also.
> 
> OK, I'll put the binaries to %{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin .
> 
Hold on to that point for a few... I think Ed Hill and Ralf Corsepius
have a valid point about %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{version}/bin being the
proper place.  I'm going to comment in the other subthread, though, so
we don't get too scattered.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux